Terror Back in NY

Terror back in NY


So how do you New Yorkers feel about a massive circus like civil trial that will in the words of the Attorney general, showcase the good of the American judicial system, for an individual who declared war on the US then carried out acts of war against civil and military targets within NY and DC?

Pretty good huh? Should bring some real attention to the city...like a World Series Championship?

Back in 2001 your senior senator Chucky Schumer said it was "'Ludicrous' to Try 9/11 Terrorists in Civilian Courts", but now he's more worried about federal funding for the extra security and overtime than keeping this nightmare from unfolding...a small economic boom for the next 5 or 10 years this "trial" will drag on? I guess that's more important these days.

The decision now makes it possible for the Terrorist to have a stage and our "innocent until proven guilty" system will support him at every turn since evidence in the case will not be able to "prove beyond reasonable doubt" since it was not collected and retained in a manner or level done in the United States by law enforcement trained on standards needed to secure conviction. If you happened to hear the flat out grilling Senator Graham gave Holder yesterday you understand that last statement. You are putting a foreign combatant on trial in OUR courts, you are giving him OUR rights to an attorney and due process and you are telling the world this will be a fair trial..but as Sen Graham said Khalid Sheikh Muhammad (KSM) was NEVER mirandized when he was first detained...he was never read his rights and given his right to silence until he talks with an attorney of his choice...remember this guy was water boarded! So why bother with the trial, because my first move as the defense would be dismissal on the ground of no rights. How do you then tell this animal, no you had no rights at the time you were detained under our system and in the same sentence tell the entire world our judicial system is fair?

But what is the underlying game? Who is really on trial? Probably the Bush administration, water boarding, CIA agents protecting us, the military, "torture" and the War on Terror as a whole. That's the political game here...and believe me when I say game, because to the left this is a GAME, because they have conveniently slipped back into the Pre-9/11 mindset. When's the last time you heard the phrase "War on Terror", Islamic Extremist, terrorist attacks or any of those terms? Just look at the Ft. Hood fiasco and the "let's not jump to any conclusions" statements out of the administration, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of a terror attack.

But that's all "political crap" that you or me will never be able to do anything about, it will bite us in the ass and we have to bear it..its our fault, we put the same jackasses back in congress so we are also to blame. But what is it that will bite us in the ass?

What Obama did...and I don't for 1 minute believe the horse S*#T that Holder made this decision on his own without White House approval like he claims, because if that is the case we got bigger problems than a terror trial! Its bad enough that Holder's firm defended terror suspects, but now he has set the stage for either the prosecution to loose or the US judicial system to look like a 3rd world kangaroo court! But back to what will bite us in the end...stick with me...by putting terrorists on trial in US civilian court in US cities you have taught that world of lunatics one very dangerous lesson. If you attack US civilians and US targets in US cities, even though you have declared war on this country, you will be treated as a criminal, you will be afforded the rights of a US citizen in a US court, you will be immediately mirandized upon detainment and provided a lawyer of your choice. The only alternative is to treat them as what they are, combatives who should be detained and tried by military courts.

So what the hell does that mean? What it means is you have just given these animals an incentive to attack CIVILIAN targets within the US, and eventually a sounding board and stage to spew their hatred and their anti-US word. Why not? Why fight in a foreign country against US soldiers? You could be killed prior to executing your mission, not so much in the US, you could be detained and "interrogated" for information that could save US lives or you could be swapped with intel agencies from other countries that wouldn’t treat you so well. Why bother? Now you can go to the US or direct attacks in the US and if you are ever captured you will be immediately mirandized and afforded all the protections of the US judicial system.

Great question and follow up by Sen. Graham to Holder: Mr. Attorney General if we captured Osama Bin Laden tomorrow would he be tried in a civilian court?
Holders response: 20 seconds of silence and then pretty much said well I'm not sure.
Sen. Graham: Will he be mirandized upon capture?
Holder: no legible response

If you get a chance check out that exchange, interesting and the answers are downright scary.


Also:
Just 38% of voters now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That’s the lowest level of support measured for the plan in nearly two dozen tracking polls conducted since June.

www.marchinthebootsofourtroops.com